Backdating in 220 1 dating advice for man

Granting stock options to employees is a generally accepted and perfectly legal form of compensating employees. Critics of backdating argue that the practice is difficult to detect and thus encourages boards and executives to use it to synthesize more creative compensation packages.

backdating in-80backdating in-37backdating in-79

The answer should be ‘no’ – as long as the effective date reflects the economic understanding of the parties and not just an attempt to gain an unpermitted benefit under law, such as, a tax benefit.

For example, a purchase agreement might be dated “effective as of’ March 31, 2012” even though the parties executed it on April 4, in order to reflect a cut off of an accounting period on March 31, after which Buyer gets the benefit and risk of changes in the Company’s financial position.

The date of an agreement is an important part of most business transactions and M & A is no exception.

Many acquisition agreements begin with an “Agreement between” the parties “effective as of” a given date.

In the context of mutual funds, a feature allowing fundholders to use an earlier date on a letter of intent to invest in a mutual fund in exchange for a reduced sales charge, e.g.

Giving retroactive value to purchases from the earlier date.

The board formally grants the stock options to John every year at its January board meeting.

Typically, the grant date of the stock options is the same as the date of the board meeting.

When he was hired, the Company XYZ board of directors offered John an attractive salary as well as an annual grant of 1,000 Company XYZ stock options.

Tags: , ,